In a disturbing echo of Serbia’s troubled past, the arrest and alleged brutal treatment of opposition politician Nikola Sandulović casts a grim shadow over the presidency of Aleksandar Vučić, a leader whose roots trace back to the propaganda machinery of the Milosevic era. This incident, as reported by the Financial Times, not only raises serious concerns about human rights violations but also serves as a stark reminder of Vučić’s controversial legacy as a former propaganda minister, a role in which he justified heinous war crimes and crimes against humanity.
Sandulović, known for his bold stance in seeking reconciliation for past atrocities, found himself in the crosshairs of the Serbian government after a poignant act of contrition for war crimes in Kosovo. His arrest by secret police and the subsequent harrowing reports of his treatment while in custody spotlight the repressive tactics reminiscent of a darker time in Serbian history. Despite the government’s denial of any mistreatment, the severity of Sandulović’s condition upon his release and the outcry from his legal team are hard to dismiss.
The Serbian Intelligence Agency’s (BIA) confirmation of Sandulović’s custody on charges of inciting ethnic hatred juxtaposes harshly with the international community’s increasing unease about Vučić’s governance. The recent allegations of election fraud and fears of an autocratic slide in Serbia have only intensified these concerns. Vučić’s tenure, marked by accusations of authoritarianism and an apparent reluctance to ease tensions with Kosovo, paints a worrying picture of a regime struggling to break free from its nationalist and oppressive tendencies.
Former BIA chief Aleksandar Vulin, sanctioned by the US for ties to the Russian government and criminal elements, claimed responsibility for Sandulović’s arrest. This only adds another layer of controversy, highlighting the questionable practices within Vučić’s administration. The BIA’s attempts to downplay the incident, labeling reports of abuse as destabilising fabrications, seem to be a desperate effort to deflect criticism and maintain a façade of legitimacy.
The international community, including the European Commission and UK’s foreign secretary, has expressed deep concern over the incident. Their calls for clarity and respect for citizen rights underscore the growing distrust of Vučić’s regime on the global stage. Kosovo’s Prime Minister Albin Kurti’s comparison of the Serbian government’s actions to Putin’s crackdown on dissent further aligns Vučić’s administration with repressive regimes, suggesting a worrying trend of authoritarianism and human rights abuses.
The case of Nikola Sandulović is not just about one man’s suffering but a chilling indicator of a regime struggling with its democratic obligations. Vučić, a leader marred by his past in a regime known for its brutality, seems to be steering Serbia back into the shadows of repression and intolerance.
The international community must remain vigilant and press for accountability, ensuring that Serbia does not revert to the dark days of its past under the guise of Vučić’s leadership.