In a shocking turn of events, former President Donald Trump was the target of an apparent assassination attempt on Saturday evening while addressing a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania. The incident, which occurred just days before Trump was set to accept the Republican nomination for the third time, has raised significant concerns about political violence in the United States.
The rally, held at the Butler Farm Show grounds, was disrupted by a barrage of gunfire, causing widespread panic among attendees. Trump, who was shot in the upper part of his right ear, was quickly surrounded by Secret Service agents and rushed to safety. Despite the severity of the situation, Trump managed to display his trademark defiance by pumping his fist in the air as he was escorted to his SUV.
Immediate Reactions and Aftermath
Trump’s campaign swiftly released a statement confirming that the presumptive GOP nominee was doing “fine” following the shooting. Trump himself took to his social media platform to describe the harrowing experience. “I knew immediately that something was wrong when I heard a whizzing sound, shots, and immediately felt the bullet ripping through the skin. Much bleeding took place,” he wrote.
The FBI identified the shooter as Thomas Matthew Crooks, a 20-year-old from Bethel Park, Pennsylvania. Crooks was shot and killed by Secret Service agents who responded to the attack. Authorities have stated that the investigation is ongoing and active, with many details yet to be uncovered.
The assassination attempt resulted in the death of one attendee and left two others critically injured. All three victims were identified as men, though their names have not been released at this time.
A New Wave of Political Violence
This incident marks the most serious attempt on a president or presidential candidate’s life since the assassination attempt on Ronald Reagan in 1981. It has brought renewed attention to the escalating political violence in the United States, a country deeply polarised as it approaches the presidential election in less than four months. The attack is expected to influence the atmosphere and security measures at the upcoming Republican National Convention in Milwaukee.
Despite the violence, organisers have confirmed that the convention will proceed as planned. Trump, after receiving treatment at a local Pennsylvania hospital, flew to New Jersey, landing at Newark Liberty International Airport shortly after midnight. Video footage posted by one of his aides showed a heavily guarded Trump deplaning, flanked by U.S. Secret Service agents and members of the agency’s counter-assault team.
President Joe Biden, who is running against Trump in the upcoming election, was briefed on the incident and spoke with Trump a few hours after the shooting. In a public statement, Biden condemned the attack, stating, “There’s no place in America for this type of violence. It’s sick. It’s sick.”
Biden, who was spending the weekend at his beach home in Rehoboth Beach, Delaware, decided to return to Washington early in light of the incident.
Blame and Condemnation
In the wake of the attack, many Republicans were quick to attribute the violence to the rhetoric of Biden and his allies, arguing that the continuous portrayal of Trump as a threat to democracy has created a hostile environment. They particularly pointed to a comment Biden made to donors on July 8, where he stated, “it’s time to put Trump in the bullseye.”
Secret Service agents, trained to respond to such threats, managed to neutralise the shooter. A heavily armed tactical team that travels with the president and major party nominees responded immediately, focusing on eliminating the threat while other agents ensured Trump’s evacuation.
Law enforcement recovered an AR-style rifle at the scene, a weapon that has become synonymous with mass shootings in the United States. An analysis by the Associated Press of various videos and photos from the rally indicated that the shooter was positioned astonishingly close to the stage, raising questions about the security measures in place.
A video posted on social media showed the shooter’s body on the roof of a building at AGR International Inc., located just north of the rally venue. The distance from the shooter’s position to where Trump was speaking was approximately 150 meters, a range within which a skilled marksman could effectively hit a human-sized target.
Kevin Rojek, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI’s Pittsburgh Field Office, confirmed that the shooter’s presence on the roof was unknown until he began firing. “It is surprising” that the gunman managed to open fire before being neutralised, he added.
Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas assured that officials were engaging with both the Biden and Trump campaigns to implement every possible measure to ensure their safety.
A Chaotic Scene
The gunfire erupted as Trump was showcasing a chart of border crossing numbers. The first shot prompted Trump to react instinctively, raising his hand to his right ear before crouching behind his lectern. Panic ensued as agents rushed to the stage, shielding Trump with their bodies while others scanned the area for the shooter.
Screams echoed through the crowd of thousands, and chaos reigned as people sought cover. Trump, despite the chaos, remained defiant. Video footage captured him standing up, his face smeared with blood, and pumping his fist in the air, mouthing the word “Fight” to his supporters, which was met with chants of “USA. USA. USA.”
Witnesses recounted the terrifying moments as they heard multiple gunshots and ducked for cover. Dave McCormick, a Republican candidate for the U.S. Senate in Pennsylvania, described how everyone around him hit the ground as the gunfire erupted. “Everybody went to their knees or their prone position because we all knew this was gunfire,” he said.
Reporters at the scene also took cover, hiding under tables as the shots rang out. Initially, the sound was mistaken for firecrackers or a car backfiring, but the reality soon became clear. The situation was eventually contained, but the shock and fear lingered.
Global Reactions
The assassination attempt on Trump has elicited a wave of reactions from global leaders. Many expressed concern and condemned the violence, highlighting the fragility of democratic processes. Argentina’s President Javier Milei described the attack as a cowardly assassination attempt, while Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese emphasised the shared democratic values between Australia and the United States.
Brazil’s President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, and French President Emmanuel Macron were among those who denounced the attack and extended their support to Trump. Other leaders, including Japan’s Prime Minister Fumio Kishida, Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador, and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, also condemned the violence and called for a thorough investigation.
The Vatican expressed its concern over the violence, with Pope Francis offering prayers for Trump’s recovery. Russian President Vladimir Putin’s spokesman noted that while they did not believe the attack was orchestrated by the current U.S. administration, the political climate had contributed to the incident.
A Stark Reminder
The attempt on Trump’s life serves as a stark reminder of the dangers faced by political figures and the volatile nature of political discourse in the United States. The parallels to past incidents, such as the assassination of Robert F. Kennedy in 1968 and the shooting of George Wallace in 1972, underscore the persistent threat of political violence.
As Trump prepares for the Republican National Convention and the upcoming election, the focus will undoubtedly shift to ensuring the safety of candidates and maintaining the integrity of the democratic process. The incident in Pennsylvania has highlighted the urgent need for heightened security measures and a concerted effort to address the underlying issues contributing to political violence.
The investigation into the motives and background of Thomas Matthew Crooks continues, with authorities working tirelessly to piece together the events leading up to the attack. As the nation grapples with the implications of this attempted assassination, the call for unity and the condemnation of violence has never been more critical.
In the face of such adversity, the resilience of democratic institutions and the commitment to peaceful political engagement must remain paramount. The events of Saturday evening in Butler, Pennsylvania, have left an indelible mark on the 2024 presidential campaign, serving as a grim reminder of the perils of political extremism and the enduring strength of democratic ideals.
Conspiracy Theories and Hate Flood Social Media After Trump Assassination Attempt
Within minutes of the news breaking about the assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump, the word “staged” began trending on X, formerly known as Twitter, in the United States. This term, often associated with conspiracy theories, quickly became a focal point for evidence-free speculation, hate, and abuse, dominating mainstream online conversations and garnering millions of views on the platform.
Historically, assassination attempts on U.S. presidents have been fertile ground for conspiracy theories, with the killing of John F. Kennedy in 1963 being the most notable example. However, this incident, unfolding in real-time, showcased the pervasive nature of unfounded rumours in today’s digital age. What stood out this time was how the frenzy gripped all sides of the political spectrum.
The rapid spread of these conspiracy theories was not confined to committed political groups. Instead, the theories were actively recommended in users’ “For You” feeds, amplifying their reach. Posts from users with blue ticks, who often enjoy greater prominence on the platform, further fuelled the narrative.
‘Staged’ Conspiracies Gain Traction
Initially, some conspiracy theories began with legitimate questions and confusion about the security failings that allowed the attacker to reach the roof of the rally venue. However, the conversation quickly descended into a wave of disbelief, speculation, and disinformation.
One widely viewed post on X claimed, “It looks very staged. Nobody in the crowd is running or panicking. Nobody in the crowd heard an actual gun. I don’t trust it. I don’t trust him.” Despite the post being labelled with a note clarifying the reality of the shooting, it amassed a million views.
The conspiracy theories were compounded by powerful images that emerged in the aftermath, including a photograph by Associated Press chief photographer Evan Vucci, showing Trump with a bloodied face and ear, fist raised, against a backdrop of the U.S. flag. A YouTube account based in the U.S. claimed the image was “too damn perfect” and suggested manipulation, a post that reached nearly one million views before being deleted.
Anti-Trump and Pro-Trump Conspiracies
The spread of conspiracies was not limited to anti-Trump users. Many left-leaning users, who regularly share their anti-Trump views, propagated theories that the event was staged to garner sympathy. Conversely, Trump supporters alleged the incident was part of a vast conspiracy.
One post from a U.S.-based account with a history of unfounded claims stated, “This is the price you pay when you take down the elite satanic paedophiles,” alluding to the QAnon conspiracy theory. The post suggested without evidence that the order for the assassination came from the CIA, implicating figures like Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and Mike Pence. This post alone was seen 4.7 million times.
Elected politicians also contributed to the frenzy. Congressman Mike Collins, a Republican from Georgia, tweeted that “Joe Biden sent the orders,” referencing a comment President Biden made about putting “Trump in a bullseye.” This post, viewed over 6 million times, was later labelled with a community note clarifying that there was no evidence of Biden’s involvement and that his remark had been taken out of context.
False Accusations and Identity Missteps
Before the FBI named the gunman as 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks, misinformation led to other individuals being falsely accused. Football commentator Marco Violi, for example, had to refute baseless claims on Instagram that he was a member of Antifa and behind the attack. These false allegations had already garnered millions of views on X by the time Violi attempted to set the record straight.
The platform’s algorithm appeared to exacerbate the spread of these conspiracies, pushing users into echo chambers where their existing beliefs were reinforced. This dynamic left many scrambling to avoid the pervasive conspiracy and speculation.
A Test for Social Media
The assassination attempt and the subsequent flood of misinformation posed a significant challenge for X, testing its ability to manage the rapid spread of harmful content. While the platform struggled, other social media sites seemed less inundated, possibly due to their differing target audiences and X’s reputation as a hub for political discourse.
Despite repeated requests for comment from the BBC, X has not responded, highlighting the platform’s ongoing issues with transparency and accountability in managing misinformation.
This incident underscores the urgent need for robust mechanisms to counteract the spread of conspiracy theories and hate on social media, particularly in times of crisis. The role of platforms like X in shaping public discourse and the potential for harm when misinformation is allowed to flourish cannot be underestimated.
Stay informed on European political tensions and armed conflicts with our unique magazine. Subscribe for exclusive insights into current affairs and ongoing global issues.
