The Hague, Netherlands — The International Criminal Court (ICC) escalated its involvement in the Israel-Palestine conflict with arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant. Both are accused of war crimes and crimes against humanity committed during their leadership in the Gaza conflict. The move has polarized international opinion, drawing condemnation from Israel, the United States, and its allies while winning praise from human rights organisations and several governments.
The warrants come amid ongoing tensions in Gaza, where thousands have been killed and displaced. Alongside Netanyahu and Gallant, the ICC also issued an arrest warrant for Mohammed Deif, the elusive leader of Hamas’s military wing, for crimes against humanity and war crimes during the October 7, 2023, assault on Israeli communities.
Israel and U.S. Allies Denounce the ICC
Prime Minister Netanyahu dismissed the ICC’s actions as a “modern Dreyfus trial,” accusing the court of bias and antisemitism. “No biased anti-Israel decision in The Hague will prevent the State of Israel from defending its citizens,” he said, pointing to Hamas’s atrocities and Israel’s extensive efforts to warn civilians in Gaza of attacks.
President Joe Biden also criticised the ICC’s decision, stating, “There is no equivalence—none—between Israel and Hamas. We will always stand with Israel against threats to its security.”
Former U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo called the decision “outrageous and disgraceful,” asserting that it rewards “Iranian-backed terrorists” and urging U.S. leaders to condemn the ICC. House Speaker Mike Johnson labeled the warrants “antisemitic” and advocated immediate legislative action, including the Illegitimate Court Counteraction Act, to prevent enforcement of the ICC’s rulings.
Human Rights Groups Welcome ICC Action
Human Rights Watch praised the ICC for breaking “the perception that certain individuals are beyond the reach of the law.” Associate international justice director Balkees Jarrah called for robust international support for the ICC, highlighting the necessity of accountability for crimes committed by all parties in the Israel-Palestine conflict.
The court’s decision was also backed by the Belgian Foreign Ministry and UN Special Rapporteur Franceska Albanese. “The fight against impunity wherever crimes are committed is a priority,” Belgium’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs declared.
Diverse Opinions in Europe and Beyond
Governments in the Netherlands, France, and Canada stated their intention to fulfill their legal obligations under the ICC’s arrest warrants. However, the U.K.’s position remains ambiguous, with Downing Street committing only to “legal obligations” without specifying enforcement measures.
Meanwhile, prominent legal experts and human rights advocates countered Israeli accusations of bias. Geoffrey Robertson KC, a former UN war crimes judge, told Channel 4 News, “It’s not antisemitic to prosecute war crimes,” adding that the ICC’s independence should not be undermined by political interference.
ICC’s Allegations and Evidence
The ICC alleges that Netanyahu and Gallant orchestrated policies amounting to war crimes, including the deliberate deprivation of Gaza’s civilian population of essentials like food, water, and medical supplies. The court accuses the two leaders of knowingly targeting civilians and failing to prevent war crimes.
Netanyahu and Gallant face allegations of using starvation as a weapon of war, a violation of international law, and of overseeing attacks against residential areas. The court also highlighted the severe humanitarian toll, including widespread malnutrition and inadequate medical care in Gaza, during the conflict.
Simultaneously, Mohammed Deif, the leader of Hamas’s military wing, is accused of planning and executing the October 7 attack on Israeli communities, which resulted in mass killings, hostage-taking, and sexual violence. The ICC believes Deif coordinated with senior Hamas leaders in carrying out the assault, described as one of the worst in Israel’s history.
Broader Implications for International Justice
The ICC’s actions underscore a broader struggle to ensure accountability in deeply entrenched conflicts. While critics argue the court is overstepping its jurisdiction and targeting sovereign states, supporters emphasise the importance of prosecuting crimes committed by both state and non-state actors.
The court, which has no enforcement power of its own, relies on member states for arrests. As divisions deepen among ICC member states and key global powers like the U.S. and Israel refuse cooperation, the path forward remains uncertain.
The international community now faces a critical choice: bolster the ICC’s mandate to hold perpetrators accountable or risk undermining its authority in addressing crimes against humanity. Whether justice can prevail in one of the world’s most contentious conflicts remains to be seen.
Stay informed on European political tensions and armed conflicts with our unique magazine. Subscribe for exclusive insights into current affairs and ongoing global issues.
