The recent remarks by James O’Brien, the United States’ Assistant Secretary of State, criticising the Government of Kosovo’s decision to ban the Serbian dinar, have raised significant concerns about the U.S.’s approach towards the Balkan geopolitics. O’Brien’s position, which aligns with Kremlin-backed Serbia, not only challenges the constitutional sovereignty of Kosovo but also risks emboldening Russia’s geopolitical ambitions in the region.
O’Brien’s insistence that Kosovo reverse its currency policy is seen by some analysts as a potential encouragement for Russia’s strategy in the Balkans, particularly in its support for Serbia’s expansionist and aggressive policies. Since Serbia’s alignment with Moscow’s foreign policy in September 2022, it has consistently opposed Western sanctions on Russia and has been a source of regional instability. This is in stark contrast to Kosovo, which has aligned itself with Western norms and policies.
The U.S.’s apparent appeasement of Kremlin-aligned Serbia, especially in light of Serbia’s ongoing territorial and constitutional aggression against Kosovo, sends a concerning message. Incidents like the abduction of Kosovar border policemen and armed incursions in northern Kosovo underscore Serbia’s destabilizing role, fueled by Russian support. By not holding Serbia accountable for such actions, the U.S. risks not only its credibility but also inadvertently supports Russia’s broader strategy to undermine Western influence in the region.
The differing U.S. responses to similar actions by Russia in Ukraine and Serbia in the Balkans highlight an inconsistency in American foreign policy. While the U.S. has strongly condemned Russia for breaching international norms in Ukraine, its response to Serbia’s actions in Kosovo, influenced by Kremlin’s policies, appears more lenient. This discrepancy undermines the U.S.’s stance on international law and sovereignty, and may embolden Russia to further push Serbia towards expansionist endeavours in the Balkans.
The recent stance of the United States, particularly the US Embassy’s support for Serbia‘s position against Kosovo’s decision to ban the Serbian dinar, has sparked a wave of criticism and raised serious questions about the balance in US foreign policy in the Balkans. This controversy was further heightened by a pointed reaction from Alicia Kearns, a UK Member of Parliament and Chair of the Foreign Affairs Committee.
Alicia Kearns’s reaction on Twitter to the US Embassy’s position was sharply critical. She highlighted the lack of a balanced approach from the US, particularly in light of its silence on significant issues like Serbia’s illegal kidnapping of three Kosovar police officers and the Banjska terror attack. Kearns’s comments underscore the perceived inconsistency in the US’s stance on issues of sovereignty and international law, especially when comparing its reactions to similar situations involving Russia in Ukraine.
The US Embassy’s position not only challenges Kosovo’s constitutional sovereignty but also risks legitimizing Serbia’s aggressive actions in the region, supported by Kremlin. This stand has raised concerns about the credibility of US commitments to supporting democratic values and the rule of law in international affairs, particularly in a region as volatile as the Western Balkans.
The situation calls for a more balanced and principled approach from the US, recognizing the complexities of the region and supporting the sovereignty and democratic aspirations of nations like Kosovo. A consistent foreign policy that firmly addresses the destabilizing actions of Serbia and its Kremlin alignment is crucial to maintain regional stability and uphold international norms.
Alicia Kearns’s intervention highlights a growing international awareness of the need for a more equitable and balanced approach in the Balkans. It serves as a reminder that the actions and statements of major global powers like the US have profound implications on regional dynamics and the perception of international law and order. The US’s approach in the coming days will be closely watched for signs of a recalibrated stance that aligns with its professed values of democracy and sovereignty.Kosovo, in its effort to strengthen democratic institutions and governance, finds its sovereignty and constitutional rights challenged not only by its neighbor but also, indirectly, by an ally it seeks to align with. The focus on the dinar issue by the U.S. overshadows more significant aspects of the Kosovo-Serbia dialogue, including mutual recognition and the establishment of the Association of Serb-majority municipalities in Kosovo.
The situation calls for a recalibrated approach by the U.S., one that recognizes the complexities of the Balkan region, supports the sovereignty and aspirations of nations like Kosovo, and firmly addresses the destabilizing actions of Serbia and its Kremlin alignment. By doing so, the U.S. can reinforce its commitment to supporting sovereign states against external aggression and uphold the principles of international law and democracy, countering Russia’s expanding influence in the Balkans.
Stay informed on European political tensions and armed conflicts with our unique magazine. Subscribe for exclusive insights into current affairs and ongoing global issues.
